Scoping and a working prototype of your business app in three weeks
Committing a six-figure budget on the strength of a sales proposal is an uncomfortable exercise, especially with no IT department to arbitrate. This offer turns that decision into an observation: seeing software run on your real case, and knowing its price, before signing anything larger.
Three weeks
from the first workshop to the prototype and the firm quote
€6,000–10,000
excl. VAT depending on scope, deducted in full from the fixed price if you proceed
Yours to keep
prototype, rules document and quote remain yours, even if you stop there
The three-week scoping and prototype engagement is our entry offer, and it is also what allows us to commit to a fixed price afterwards. A committed price has to be prepared: it assumes we have seen your real business rules, your volumes and your data — not that we have read a six-page brief.
What you are buying
Two scoping workshops
Half a day to a full day each, with your teams — not only management. We model the process as it is actually executed, unofficial exceptions included, and identify the use case that carries the most value.
A working prototype
Software that runs, on your priority use case, loaded with a sample of your own anonymised data. Your users operate it themselves; they do not watch a mock-up scroll past.
A rules document
Your business rules written down and signed off: scales, thresholds, derogations, user populations and permissions. It is the deliverable with the longest shelf life, including if you go on to consult elsewhere.
A firm quote for the full build
The scope cut into batches, a committed price for each, an indicative schedule and the assumptions spelled out. Not a range: the price we commit to if you decide to proceed.
Week by week
Week 1 — understand the real process
First workshop with the teams concerned, collection of a sample of anonymised production data, review of existing material: standard contracts, calculation spreadsheets, procedures. Mostly we are looking for what is written nowhere and applied by everybody.
Week 2 — build and confront
The prototype is built on the priority use case. At the end of the week, the second workshop: users operate the first version and correct our assumptions. That is the session where the rules missing from workshop one surface.
Week 3 — adjust, price, present
Prototype adjusted after the second workshop, rules document written, full project cut into batches and priced firmly. Presented in session, with the remaining areas of uncertainty named and their potential effect on the price.
What the prototype is not
This is the point we are most explicit about, because a misunderstanding here poisons everything that follows. The prototype exists to support a decision, not to run your operations.
- It is not a version one going into production: it has neither the robustness, nor the security, nor the data migration of a live application.
- It covers a single use case, chosen for its decision value — not the whole functional scope.
- It is not opened to your members or suppliers: the test users are internal and named.
- It is neither maintained nor hosted long-term beyond the final session, unless separately agreed.
- It is not free, deliberately: a free prototype is built in two days on invented data and teaches nobody anything.
What you have to provide
Three weeks hold because the pace is tight. The conditions below are not formalities: when one is missing, the schedule slips mechanically.
- An available business owner: roughly two days spread across the three weeks, workshops included, with the standing to make scope decisions.
- A sample of anonymised production data: an export of your declarations, your contracts or your calculation workbooks. Invented data produces a flattering prototype and a wrong estimate.
- The existing business rules in whatever form they live: written procedures, standard contracts, or simply the people who have been applying them for ten years.
- Two to four users available for the second workshop — the people who execute the process, not only those who supervise it.
- Someone able to say what is out of scope: scoping is as much about removing items as adding them.
What you keep if you do not proceed
Everything. The prototype and its code, the rules document and the quote are yours, with no reservation clause. You may use them to consult other suppliers — several organisations use exactly this to build a serious tender, which is an entirely legitimate use of the engagement.
At minimum you leave with two things you did not have: an internal demonstration that makes the project tangible for your board or management committee, and a credible budget to decide against. Sometimes the conclusion is to build nothing, because the process can be simplified rather than tooled. Reaching that conclusion for a few thousand euros is the best possible return on this spend.
When we advise against it
- When the requirement is already written, priced and arbitrated internally: scoping would add nothing and we quote the project directly.
- When no business owner can free up time this quarter: better to postpone than to produce a scope built on assumptions.
- When the decision to invest has not yet been taken at the level that decides: a prototype does not replace an internal political arbitration.
- When the real need is a heavily standardised off-the-shelf package — payroll, general accounting, office software. We say so during the discovery call rather than charge for scoping to find out.
- When the subject is maintenance on an existing system you intend to keep: what you need is an audit, not a prototype.
MEKANO is a Lyon-based development studio. We build the management applications of small and mid-sized companies and of buying groups — member portals, supplier approval, revenue declarations, year-end rebate engines, document management — at a fixed price, in batches with formal acceptance, source code handed over. This entry offer is the first step of every project we take on.
Frequently asked questions
- Why is scoping charged when others offer it free?
- Because free scoping is a sales activity, not engineering. Three weeks put a team on your real data and produce a prototype that runs: that has a cost, and charging for it is what allows the result to be yours with no strings attached. It is also what makes the subsequent quote sustainable. A supplier committing to a price without having seen your data is placing a bet they will recover through change orders.
- How is the €6,000–10,000 range set?
- By the scope to be framed, not by the size of your organisation. The lower end covers a single, well-bounded process — a revenue declaration module, a rebate engine. The upper end covers several interlocking processes with distinct user populations, typically a member portal combined with supplier approval. The amount is fixed before we start, and it is deducted in full from the fixed price if the project proceeds.
- Can the prototype then go into production?
- No, and you should not want it to. A prototype takes deliberate shortcuts on security, permissions, data migration and load handling — which is exactly what makes three weeks possible. It is not thrown away, though: the business modelling, the interface decisions validated by your users and part of the technical base carry over at project kick-off, which shortens the first batch.
- What if the quote exceeds our budget?
- That is a useful result, arrived at the right moment. We then rework the batching: which batch carries most of the value, what can wait a financial year, which process can stay on its current tool for longer. Many projects end up starting on a reduced first batch funded from the current year, with the rest decided after it goes live. You are not paying for a quote you are obliged to accept.
- How long from first contact to the start of scoping?
- A thirty-minute discovery call is enough to establish whether the need fits what we do — we say plainly when it does not. After that, the lead time depends mainly on both schedules and on your business owner's availability: usually two to four weeks. The three weeks start on the date of the first workshop, fixed at signature.
Read next
Fixed-price development: what the model actually puts on each side
A billing model is not an administrative detail: it decides who loses money when a project slips. Fixed price moves that risk to the supplier, time and materials leaves it with the client. Both are defensible — provided you know which situation you are in before signing.
Read moreManagement applications for buying groups and member networks
The pillar: supplier approval, revenue declarations, rebate calculation, document management and a member portal, in one platform fitted to your rules.
Read moreReplacing an obsolete ERP or an abandoned proprietary application
A management system does not die overnight. It slowly becomes impossible to change: the vendor has stopped answering, the developer who wrote it has left, the language version is out of support. At that point the question is no longer technical — it is which exit costs least.
Read morePhased delivery with formal acceptance: how a project actually runs
A software project is not judged on its opening schedule but on what happens in month four, when a forgotten rule surfaces and the switchover date is closing in. Batch delivery and formal acceptance exist to make that moment manageable rather than adversarial.
Read moreLet's talk about your situation
Thirty minutes, no commitment. You leave with a straight answer on feasibility, a budget order of magnitude and the next steps.
Book the call